Documents obtained by Page Six show that the court ruled that “no statement” made by the Skims founder, 41, was “allegedly defamatory” against the 33-year-old alum “Rob & Chyna”. Chyna’s team had previously argued that they only had to prove that anyone involved in the case – including Kim, Khloé Kardashian, Kylie Jenner and Kris Jenner – was “responsible” for defaming Chyna, whose real name is Angela White. Jurors were asked to examine evidence, including emails and messages Khloé, Kylie and Kris sent to network executives. The court agreed on Friday that there was no “evidence” to suggest that Kim had a “responsible role” in defaming Chyna, according to the documents, so the Skims founder withdrew from the defamation claim. The decision was based on the lawyers’ arguments, the court minutes and the lawyer’s documents. Although Kim has been acquitted of defamation, she is potentially still on the hook for allegedly deliberately interfering in a contract. Kim Kardashian got rid of Blac Chyna.Getty on Friday. SplashNews Chyna accused the Kardashian-Jenner family of using their influence to cancel a possible second season of E! reality show. However, Jeff Jenkins, former co-chairman of Bunim-Murray and executive producer of the series, testified last week that networks such as BET, VH1, Lifetime and MTV are also not interested in getting “Rob & Chyna”. Chyna is seeking more than $ 100 million in financial damages, including loss of profits from social media posts, club and TV appearances and general compensation for emotional distress. “Rob & Chyna” aired for one season in 2016. Getty Images The Kardashian-Jenner family’s lawyer, Michael Rhodes, tried to dismiss the case outright last Friday, saying Chyna’s allegations were “absurd”. He also said that the total amount of compensation is based on “unsupported and highly speculative claims”, as he has not provided the appropriate accounting records. The jury was discussing from 9:30 a.m. local time and could make a decision on the case by the end of Friday.
